. ,
Search
Section
Keyword
Physicians Posts
Posts' Comments
  • I have embraced digital technology especially electronic paper records and remote video consultations to improve quality of care of my patients. Physicians need to change their behaviour and adapt to modern methods which is one of the greatest influence of the Covid 19 pandemic which has driven it forward at great speed.

    • One more laudatory paper in favor of vaccination ( not strictly devoid of conflict of interest). PASC is not a perfectly defined medical entity . The data  selected from the platform probably miss part of the larger picture. We don’t know what is in direct relation with Covid and what is due to the life style change induced by the infection 

      • I had one 5 years old and another 46 years old patient with significant hear loss post COVID. I cannot be sure of course but it is very likely due to covid. 

        • Hi,

          In our Audiologic and Neurotogic center we have not patients with documented sensorineural deafness related to Sars Covid 19 infection. 

          • Hola: Creo que es muy justo que los colegas médicos que estuvieron en la primera línea de atención de pacientes con COVID 19, los cuales adquirieron una enfermedad en el ejercicio de su profesión deben ser sujetos a los beneficios del seguro de riesgos de trabajo.
            También cualquier trabajador que se enferme con motivos laborales como enfermeras, personal de limpieza, administrativo, paramédico, etc.
            Desafortunadamente esto depende del médico o comité que dictamina el riesgo y como en el caso de estos colegas, es muy desgastante todo el proceso.

            • I respect every one, beside in a democratic country, any one is free to do what he wants, respecting the general laws. even in an emergency like the Covid period one. So, if respectful people what to be treated in my office, I feel free to refuse my intervention, free of any guilty feeling ( ad a medical doctore, that refuses a patient) because I know that many doctors , that do not have the vaccine themselves will be happy to have care of them.

              • I have seen some cases  of complaints of concentrated urine followed by episodes of polyuria during and straight after CoVid infection

                • I am a bit tired to explain more deep so I will be brief – the data we have and the things we know, the most recent papers about cumulative permanent health damage after multiple Covid infections together with our recently submitted work regarding likely life-long increased cardiovascular risks after covid show that in our devastating situation (that most yet don´t understand) and upcoming several covid waves our recent best bet is to vaccinate that lady again with a specific omicron booster maybe in a lower dose of mRNA like Pfizer. This is what I would do from what I know now, and I haven´t been much wrong in these matters since the beginning which with recent data gave me a bad sleep. We will see further data. Not the data regarding serious disease or symptomatic disease, but the cumulative health damage from repetitive Covid infections and how it is influenced by vaccines. Let´s hope for now it is influenced by the vaccines...

                  • Buenas tardes, yo si estoy orgulloso de casi todos mis colegas y apasionados médicos, con mucho sentido común de este foro, donde se pone por delante al ser humano antes que al cientificismo actual, de infinitos estudios que aportan tan poco en entender el enfermar crónico. En los problemas de salud actual, casi todo se resume y reduce a la cronicidad, donde podemos decir que nada pasa por casualidad, ni por accidente, siendo el Covid una manifestación mas de ello. Saludos alegres del neardental de Sevilla.

                    • If we analyse vaccination and Covid19-incidence data from Germany (still substantial vaccination activity with mRNA-vaccines) and Israel, Sweden, Danmark or the Netherlands and especially look at the time of vaccination activity in the infection-wave it might be concluded that vaccination with mRNA-based vaccines at the time of high infection level in the population even boosters the infection wave. Therefore in our institution the use of mRNA-based vaccines at time of high infection level in our population is not allowed (mRNA-based vaccines are forbidden in our institution since January this year). So what is the reason for refusing patients behaving rationally. It is high time to evaluate what we are doing as physicians without dogmatism.


                      • I have a 72-year-old patient who suffers from a severe paranoid psychosis three days after receiving the third dose of the Covid vaccine that requires hospitalization.  He had never had metal disorders before.  At 3 months he is back to normal.

                        • Vous voulez une réponse scientifique ou politique ? Politiquement, la commission européenne s'est engagée à acheter ferme une quantité considérable de Pfizer, et accessoirement moderna, jusqu'en 2023, avec un échéancier précis. Les Polonais commencent déjà à jeter les stocks périmés, car les malades en veulent de moins en moins (tant à cause de situations du genre de celles que vous décrivez, qu'à cause de la dangerosité virale décroissante versus celle du vaccin). Nous sommes donc dans une situation de vente forcée.  Scientifiquement, ce serait bien la première fois qu'une vaccination donne une immunité meilleure que la maladie elle-même. A noter que la campagne de vaccination de l'an dernier s'est accompagnée d'une explosion de cas; des anticorps facilitants liés à la modification de la spike ont été incriminés par certains équipes, d'autres arguant d'une possible contamination sur le site de l'injection. Il semblerait que ce phénomène ait disparu pour omicron. La maladie elle-même semble très peu immunisante; vu le nombre très élevé de formes inapparentes, il semble utile de penser à des approches thérapeutiques complémentaires. Si le cas que vous citez a bien survécu à son covid, cela prouve qu'il n'est pas susceptible de faire une forme grave. Donc la vaccination serait purement altruiste. Le vaccin ne donnant aucune immunité au niveau des muqueuse respiratoires (Ig A), la réduction de contagiosité liée à la vaccination, déjà estimée comme très faible, est très probablement nulle dans ce cas là. Donc, dans le cas que vous citez, la vaccination n'a strictement aucun intérêt. Nous ne sommes pas dans de la science. 

                          • Dr Pangaud de Gouville. Cardiologue France

                            Bonjour ,

                            C’est une question de délai entre la deuxième injection ….et la survenue malencontreuse de la Covid. 48 h plus tard  . Cette deuxième injection n’a pas eu le temps d’apporter une véritable protection , et a été en quelque sorte «  annihilée «  par l’infection virale . Donc : inefficace !! Il faudra envisager la prochaine , en controlant l’évolution du taux des AC 

                            • To date, there is no covid vaccine that produces sterile immunity, unlike, for example, measles vaccine or tetanus vaccine  This means that despite vaccination, I can still fall ill with covid, I can keep pathogens in my body and also I can  excrete them and infect others with them. 

                              So: What is the benefit of such a vaccination? 

                              • Before turning away unvaccinated patients from care,  I think such patients should be made aware of the risks that both they and other patients would be exposed to by choosing to not accept vaccination against Covid-19.


                                Magazines Posts

                                Close