It would have been nice if the story had described how the study controlled for the fact that women do specialties with lower mortality rates because the patients in those specialties have a lower rate of critical illness.  So now I have to go find the study in the Annals of Internal Medicine.  If the unit of analysis was the patient, I can see how you could compare mortality between male and female physicians looking after the same types (age, Dx, "severity", SES, insured or not, etc.) of patients with attempts to control, difficult as this is in administrative databases.

One possible mechanism is that woman complain about a lot of functional symptoms while men rarely do.  (They get drunk and start fights and get in car crashes instead.).  Women are more socialized to see their issues as "medical", men less so, so women see doctors more readily.  We learn that if a man is complaining, he's probably got something bad (or is drug-seeking.)  For the women, the doctor has to burn through the psychosocial angst, and the chronic fatigue syndrome/fibromyalgia/long Covid distractions like a radar system trying to see the airplanes through the chaff, and figure out if this woman actually has something.  Even if this particular woman has no history of functional complaints, there is a tendency to "profile" her as statistically unlikely to have anything wrong with her.

Women with serious diseases often tell of many visits to doctors before the diagnosis was made.  What we don't hear about are the legion of women who are evaluated many times over their lives and have nothing.  I think the danger is that in a time-sensitive environment, "common things are common" over-rules a careful Bayesian search for clues that this complaint is different.  Women doctors might have a better shared sense of how to do this, or be willing to take more time (because they don't mind earning less) than male physicians. 

Mortality is an odd end-point, albeit easy to ascertain from administrative databases.  But mortality as measured over how long?  The vast majority of delayed/missed diagnoses don't lead to death.

Pretty soon it won't matter.  Women will have the field of medicine entirely to themselves.

Just my two cents.  (Which is worth about 1.5 cents American.)

I practiced Rheumatology for 38 years. I don't care what a family medicine study says . I did it every day and I can tell you if you understand all the things that cause back pain which family md's don't  x rays are extremely useful. You also need to understand that many of these studies are sponsored by state entities looking to cut costs . I once came across a BMJ study saying steroid injections for OA don't work. It was a bunch of misinformation. It was sponsored by the British Health system .Science is being manipulated  for political reasons in some cases. The Covid pandemic is clear evidence of that.

   But making generalized statements saying cervical and lumbar spine films don't correlate with symptoms is complete hogwash. Its misleading and deleterious to good patient care.  You wont find a competent Rheumatologist saying that . Of course you don't rush to x ray someone with non radiating  muscle tenderness in the low back for a few days after some heavy work .But you would if it was there for a month.

      Dear Joseph BURLEY,

One would be a complete and utter fool to promote ANY campaign proposed by the psychopathic WEF/Gates/WHO/USG cabal. It is time for The Great Reject.

An excellent example of how trustworthy these people are:

https://slaynews.com/news/top-who-official-testifies-covid-passports-scam-push-fake-mrna-shots/

Can someone please go through this string and delete the multiple copies of each single comment that seem to be there.

It seems that cancer rates have gone up, but it could be due to many factors, Covid itself, people's not seeking treatment as early as they might have otherwise, dietary and other changes while stuck at home, etc. etc. 

There will be risks to the vaccine, but are they greater than the risk of not being vaccinated? This will likely change from one age group to another. We need research, not speculation about individual, or a few cases, that could well be just coincidence. So many people had the vaccine that you would expect to see cases like this by chance. If it isn't by chance then you need much more than a few individual examples to find any pattern.

As for the physician who said he or she cannot stand science and scientists, then I assume they are not actually a physician. To qualify as a physician you train as a scientist to some extent, even if all you do is keep up to date. Without that knowledge you have no way of understanding various papers and knowing which ones are likely valid to your practice, and which had poor research methodology and therefore should not be given as much consideration.

Je voudrais remercier tous les collègues qui ont le courage et la liberté de s’exprimer sur cette question. Le week-end dernier, nous avons organisé un symposium à Berne sur le thème de la gestion de la crise du COVID (www.symposium-2024.ch). Le sujet du développement du cancer après l’injection d’ mRNA y a également été abordé. Je voudrais attirer l’attention sur l’un des mécanismes possibles. Le mRNA contenu dans le vaccin COVID a été modifié par le méthylpseudouridyle, d’où le nom modRNA (pensez au nom de l’entreprise « Moderna »). Cette modification entraîne des erreurs de transcription, de sorte que même la structure primaire des protéines résultantes est d’une part incorrecte et d’autre part très différente, ce qui a un effet correspondant sur la structure secondaire, tertiaire et quaternaire. Le résultat est que notre système immunitaire est confronté à d’innombrables protéines étrangères différentes. Une base solide pour les maladies auto-immunes et le manque d’élimination des cellules tumorales. De mon point de vue, c’est l’un des plus grands scandales de l’histoire de la médecine, d’autant plus que la communauté scientifique refuse d’enquêter et de traiter ces faits !

It would be good to have one for long-covid too. So that we can start rehab early and manage what the patient should expect

Dear Joel... SO sorry to hear this, One of my close friends (another ophthalmologist who went Alt Med) developed myocarditis immediately after injection #2 - ejection fraction dropped to 30% and he could not walk across a room without becoming SOB. He improved over about a year and a half, but will never be the same.. My late step-mpther had a stroke after #2. I see young patients every week who have "mysterious" sudden appearance of aggressive cancers of all types. Medical minds remain closed to the idea that they have been misled and continue to push "vaxxx" of all types.

I was active duty US Army in the 70s when the "swine flu" was the thing. I began to question all of the mandated injections then and my paranoia has only increased over time.Our health care system is corrupt beyond redemption in this collapsing empire.

THE best source for reliable treatment for COVID-19 and vaxxx related injuries is here:

https://covid19criticalcare.com/treatment-protocols/

Wishing the best for you!

Friends and colleagues... It is apparent that most do not fully comprehend the vast crimes against Humanity that have been and are being carried out against We-the-99% in the name of depopulation and implementation of a techno-totalitarian fascist world government. The facts are over-whelming and clearly obvious to any who care to research this on their own.

The US government and its fellow travelers (mainly the 5 Eyes states and the EU) developed (over decades) and deployed (accident or on purpose? it matters not) a bioweapon upon Humanity for its own evil purposes. The plan is still moving forward. 

Are there increased cancers with COVID-19 and, especially, the experimental gene therapy falsely labelled as a "vaccine"? Absolutely. Excess deaths alone in every country are proof of the crime, but the masses are pacified with excuses like "climate change" or China or Russia or Hamas is responsible. The fact is that the guilty parties remain in power and are still engaged in their psychopathic quest for world domination.

It is past time to wake up and be aware.. if you value your patients - your family - Humanity - do NOT comply with evil.

Pardon the rant, but this must be said.

Do some research - start here...

https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/congressional-acts-passed-between

https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/government-directed-mass-murder-legal

@ Anonymous, COVID-19 group, Rheumatology, France   

J'espère que quelqu'un répondra !!! Quelques heures se sont écoulées depuis votre message, cher collègue anonyme. L'anonymat est-il aussi un signal ??? J'ai écrit à une époque sans méfiance sur certaines positions prises sur le sujet... sur les silences de spécialistes ou ultra-spécialistes (généticiens moléculaires etc)... cependant je n'ai toujours pas eu de réponses... votre question est "puissante" qui il faudrait quelqu'un d'aussi "puissant" pour dire qu'il étudie le sujet... est-ce suffisant ? Peut être pas. Mais je m'en contenterais aussi... Je suis revenu sur ce réseau social par hasard et votre question me fait "en arrière" et "en avant"... La finalité d'un réseau social médical spécialisé doit être la liberté de pensée, comme ainsi que de la responsabilité personnelle.

PS : j'ai la nausée d'entendre parler de "scientifiques" "Science" : j'aimerais lire ou entendre parler de la méthode scientifique actuelle, car si on a lu Popper ou Kuhn etc on devrait en être moins sûr ; le doute est une croissance pour moi !

PPS : peut-être que pour moi et pour ceux qui liront mes bêtises il vaudra mieux rester à l'écart...

[avec l'aide du traducteur Google]

Never forget, that many of so called Long COVID patients are indeed PostVac cases..!

Cancer post covid vaccin: that’s my idea.

I would leave the PortCath in place only if the clotting has fully resolved. I would also check time since any covid vaccines which have been associated with significant increase in thrombotic events